Whats a Cheap Printing Place?

Kinkos is the last place I would look. Check your phone book. Get price quotes from actual real printing and graphic places, and see if you have an Office Depot or Econoprint in your area. Forget Office Max, they are as high as Kinkos.

1. Frequently Asked Questions | Printa Systems, Screen Printing Equipment & Screen Printing Machines

770 Series packages start at $5,995. Every system comes complete with an exposure unit, on board curing unit, screens, inks, and all the other supplies you need to start printing right away. The 770 Series also has a built-in air-circulated drying case that eliminates the need for a darkroom for screen preparation.

2. Printing ascending ASCII, Cops

Output:Should not be too difficult, even if the result is not exactly what you would expect

3. Good application for printing envelopes?

OpenOffice.org does envelopes quite excellently.Open any text document, click on Insert Envelope. The rest is completely self-explanatory to anybody who's ever had to use office-type software

4. Why do Confederate apologists refuse to admit that secession was all about slavery, when the various states' articles of secession specifically articulate this fact?

Slavery was decades old before the Civil War. The arguments concerning slavery were as old as the republic, and slavery was legal and permitted under the Constitution! It had been found constitutional by the Supreme Court. So why would the South begin a war over slavery when they were WINNING the argument?The idea of unlimited federal power was much older than the slavery debates of the nineteenth century and was recognized as an unresolved issue at the time. Would the united states, melted down into one nation, be practicable or consistent with individual freedom? Thomas Jefferson warned that if the federal government was allowed to define the limits of its own powers, the result would be "not short of despotism." The fighting began because of secession!In the mid-20th century as the centennial of the war approached, historians became mesmerized by the idea of identifying the reasons for the conflict, setting off a new wave of printing. Yet the causes proved so lost in a maze of interrelated factors and so obscured by the hidden agendas of those who wrote, or rewrote, history that there was no possibility of identifying all of them.

Historians found that more than two years before the outbreak of hostilities, Americans had already identified, to their satisfaction at least, a very powerful cause for the bloody struggle that loomed between the increasingly antagonistic sections of their country. "It is an irrepressible conflict between opposing and enduring forces," declared William H. Seward. Some modern historians still agree with this outspoken anti-slavery Republican, but others disagree, believing the war could have been avoided by compromise. A more meaningful debate has centered in recent years around the people who found themselves caught in undercurrents of history so strong and compelling that they were unable to avoid conflict. This discussion has sparked several interesting lines of research into the nature of American society before and during the conflict, and historians have studied constitutional theory, politics, economics, geography, and society in an attempt to understand the wartime generationThis research has made it clear that secession, and not slavery, was the precipitating controversy of the war. Although anti-slavery was a prominent reform movement of the period, other causes, such as temperance, women's rights, religious revival, public education, concerns for the poor, and prison reform, were as zealously pursued by activists.

Of these only slavery and disunion became politically charged issues in the antebellum period; and as the middle ground of compromise on such issues was eroded, only the extreme positions became viable, until disunion brought on armed conflict. Universal abolition, never an overall war aim of the Northern war effort, was not even recognized by the proclamation of emancipation of 1863.How did the nation come to such an impasse? Historians have long held that part of the answer may lie in the questions about the nature of the American nation that had been left undecided by the Founders. Of these questions, the continuation of slavery and the political relationship between the state and national governments had resisted resolution. The crux of the slavery issue revolved around the question of whether the United States had been founded as a free republic that allowed slavery or as a slaveholding republic with pockets of freedom. The question of "states' rights" held at issue whether the state or the national government was ultimately sovereign.

Since both situations had existed simultaneously for decades, which was the aberration?Few observers at the time thought that the questions raised about the fundamentals of American society and government would come to be "settled only at the cannon's mouth."[i]If it makes some observers "feel good" to think that the Civil War was fought to free a minority race of other persons from cruel bondage, great. It's just not true![i] Calvin Colton, ed. , The Private Correspondence of Henry Clay (Cincinnati: N.p., 1856), 313. From a letter written by former president John Quincy Adams to Clay.